BPI officials weigh merits of turf fields
Research is vital when purchasing and maintaining a turf material sports field.
“Pick a product that will work best for you,” said Mike O'Brien, athletic director for the Fox Chapel Area School District.
O'Brien, a Brentwood High School graduate, spoke to members of the Brentwood Park Initiative last week about his experience on five previous occasions when purchasing and installing a turf field.
The Brentwood Park Initiative is a nonprofit organization of community leaders and residents working to raise money for the $8 million renovation. The first two phases of the park renovation are scheduled to begin in the spring, with Brentwood Borough Council approving the master plans for the project on Tuesday .
O'Brien said members should ask specific questions about the excavation process, filler materials, warranties and other such items before making a decision.
Turf field lasts eight to 10 years, O'Brien said.
If a field costs $1 million, the group should set aside 10 percent of the cost in case they encounter problems during construction.
He also suggested that the group consider a financial plan to maintain and replace the field as needed.
“You need to figure out how to do it again in eight to 10 years,” O'Brien said.
Frank Cappetta, a BPI director, said the group plans to tour several fields ranging before making specific recommendations to Brentwood Borough Council for final approval.
“If you go on those fields, you can feel the difference,” Cappetta said.
Likewise, other members, like Julie McCarthy, a BPI director, said they want to get a good field for the amount of money that they raised.
“We want a field. We want a nice surface,” McCarthy said.
Laura Van Wert is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5814 or at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.