Taxes will go up for some Brentwood residents, after borough council approved the final millage for 2013.
Brentwood Borough Council approved to set the final property tax rate at 7.5 for 2013 on Tuesday. The group first unanimously approved decreasing the millage from 8.5 to 7.14 to make the $16.56 million budget revenue neutral, and then, in a 5-2 vote, increased the millage to 7.5 or a 5 percent windfall, as Allegheny County allowed municipalities to do in 2013.
The increases and decreases in millage are because of the 2011 Allegheny County property tax reassessments, which take effect in 2013.
One mill in Brentwood is equal to $400,000.
Councilmen Pasquale “Pat” Carnevale and Martin Vickless voted against the 5 percent increase.
“To me, that's a raise in taxes,” Carnevale said.
Brentwood Borough Council approved the $15.56 million 2013 budget on Dec. 11. Highlights of the budget include $3.75 millions for capital improvement projects; $2.546 million to complete the first two phases of the Brentwood Park renovation; and constructing a $1.25 million public works facility.
Of the $3.75 million capital improvements budget, about $500,000 will go toward repaving Brownsville Road; $300,000 will go toward repaving Hillson Avenue; $100,000 for equipment such as a new high lift for public works and a police vehicle; $25,000 to repair the Brentwood Public Library roof; $50,000 in bond payments for constructing the public works facility; and $300,000 in architecture fees for the design to construct a new municipal building.
Laura Van Wert is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5814 or at firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.