Baldwin officials to finalize budget next month
A vote next month likely will finalize Baldwin Borough's property tax rate for 2013.
The rate will reflect an additional 5 percent in tax revenue compared to last year — something which is permitted as part of the court-ordered countywide property reassessment process.
Baldwin Council members met on Tuesday for a continuation of their Jan. 15 meeting to adopt the town's 2013 budget. Municipalities in Allegheny County have until Jan. 31 to pass their final budgets for 2013, thanks to an extension granted by Allegheny County Senior Common Pleas Court Judge R. Stanton Wettick Jr., who is overseeing the countywide reassessments.
Council Tuesday, in a 5-0 vote, approved Baldwin's 2013 budget, which includes a $10,867,935 general fund and $7,866,627 sewer fund. They also agreed to set a “revenue neutral” tax rate for community of 5.15 mills.
Council members, then, agreed to advertise an adjusted final tax rate for the town of 5.41 mills.
Municipalities must change their property tax rate to become “revenue neutral” based on the final certified reassess values of properties, meaning they will not get any surplus funding from the property reassessments.
Municipalities can, however, take a 5-percent “windfall,” which Baldwin officials have opted to do. This will be reflected with the new rate of 5.41 mills.
Borough leaders have said they are taking the additional 5-percent to allow for the reimbursement on any outstanding property appeals in the community. Any additional money will be put into the capital reserve fund, officials have said.
Stephanie Hacke is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5818 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Landlord opens door in Brentwood to help those who served
- Pleasant Hills Middle school celebrates 50 years with nod to past
- West Jefferson Hills school district to discuss grading policy
- Streets Run used as detour
- Baldwin police officers lauded for work
- Coach in Baldwin-Whitehall does not get middle school football job
- Brentwood school district issues measles letter in response to social media stir
- Pleasant Hills library to try old-fashioned approach to reading