Major crimes drop since 2010 in Baldwin
Reports of major crimes dropped by more than 20 percent in Baldwin Borough since 2010.
Police Chief Michael Scott told council members at their Jan. 15 meeting that Part 1 crimes — homicide, rape, burglaries and criminal mischiefs of $500 or more — declined two years in a row in the municipality with nearly 20,000 residents.
From 2011 to 2012, reports of violent crime were down by 4 percent, Scott said. Between 2010 and 2011, the crimes had dropped by nearly 19 percent.
Baldwin Borough will pay for half of a sanitary sewer relocation along Glass Run Road, costing the municipality $64,455.
Council members last month approved a cost-sharing agreement with the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation for the project. PennDOT also will be responsible to pay for half of the project, Baldwin engineer Larry Souleret said.
Stephanie Hacke is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5818 or email@example.com.
Two Baldwin Borough fire companies and the Baldwin Emergency Medical Services received funding through the state Volunteer Fire Company and Volunteer Ambulance Service award program for 2012-13.
Baldwin Emergency Medical Services received $26,419 in grants, Option Independent Volunteer Fire Company received $11,500 and South Baldwin Volunteer Fire Company received $12,793, Councilman Larry Brown said last week.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.