Jefferson Hills Council approves payments for treatment plant construction
Jefferson Hills will begin next month its first payment for the $56 million cost for the Clairton Municipal Authority to expand the wastewater-treatment plant.
Borough council approved Monday night to pay $593,934 from March to December 2013 for Jefferson Hills' share of the $1.9 million total bond payment for the $56 million construction.
Jefferson Hills' flow is about 30 percent of the overall amount the Clairton Municipal Authority handles, said Andrew McCreery, Jefferson Hills finance director.
“At some point, we were going to have to pay it,” McCreery said.
“We didn't know how Clairton wanted to do the bond payment. It was anticipated. We knew this was coming at some point.”
The expansion, which will allow the plant to take on more wastewater flow, is required by the state Department of Environmental Protection, McCreery said.
Borough officials were told in January that the payments would begin, but McCreery said Jefferson Hills is prepared. The payments will come from the borough's sewer revenue fund.
Council also voted on the following items Monday:
• Advertising the 2013 pavement maintenance program. The program costs $375,000 and includes Alice and Decker avenues; Third Street; and, officials hope, Wray Large Road, from state Route 51 to state Route 885, said Tom Lovell, public works director.
• Purchasing two in-car digital video systems from Watch Guard for $10,540 and gym equipment for the police from Fitness Doctor for $9,865.
Laura Van Wert is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5814 or at email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Hearing set on Baldwin housing complex
- Tiny ‘council’ endorses big changes in Whitehall
- Jefferson Regional Foundation taking applications for grants
- Council approves work on Pleasant Hills shopping center
- Richter: Various databases can help library users with health education
- Baldwin officials take step to improve parks
- Officials remain at odds over Brentwood borough building
- Whitehall Council follows tradition; rotates leadership seats