Brentwood budget likely to change
A lot likely will change before Brentwood Borough School Board members vote in June on final approval of the district's 2013-14 budget, leaders said Monday.
And those adjustments — particularly in state funding contributions and health care costs — likely will cause alterations to be made to the $20,805,278 proposed preliminary spending plan for next school year, which board members approved in an unanimous vote on Monday night.
“This is not necessarily the budget that will be approved in June,” board Vice President David Schaap said.
With uncertainty surrounding many numbers in the 2013-14 budget, board members have said they want to have the utmost options available to them when it comes time for passage of next school year's budget.
Therefore, they have agreed to apply for referendum exceptions from the Pennsylvania Department of Education to raise taxes above a state issued index for the district of 2.4 percent. Board members also approved this Monday.
Brentwood will seek referendum exceptions for special education costs and Pennsylvania School Employees' Retirement System contributions, said business manager Jennifer Pesanka.
As part of this process, a preliminary budget must be approved by the board by the end of February.
To balance Brentwood's 2013-14 budget would require a nearly 2-mill tax increase — taking the district rate from 28.27 to 30.0126.
Stephanie Hacke is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5818 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.