Pleasant Hills police chief reviews 2012 crime statistics
Thefts and drug- and alcohol-related incidents top the crimes in Pleasant Hills in 2012.
The Pleasant Hills police released its yearly crime-statistics report, which includes a total of 268 arrests and 3,969 traffic tickets and warnings, Chief Edward Cunningham said. The report is meant to strengthen communication, and therefore trust and relationships, between the police and residents.
“Pleasant Hills and Whitehall, we're safe communities but we're not an island,” Cunningham said.
Cunningham said patrols are increased when they can be, and he asks residents to look out for suspicious activities and then call 911 if they see anything to help deter crime in 2013. The goal is for residents to feel comfortable with the police to call 911 more often, he said.
“We increase the patrols as best we can, especially at night,” Cunningham said. “If you call 911, there's a chance that we could be in the area and catch them.”
There were 148 thefts, including those from vehicles, last year, Cunningham said.
Many of those thefts are from unlocked vehicles, Cunningham said.
Twice last year vehicles were stolen because the doors were unlocked, Cunningham said. Guns were stolen out of unlocked vehicles on three occasions.
Also, there were 127 drug- or alcohol-related incidents in 2012, Cunningham said. They include 38 drug arrests, 59 for driving under the influence and 30 for public intoxication.
In addition, other crimes include 24 burglaries, three robberies, two sexual assaults and six missing-persons reports, Cunningham said. There were 421 traffic accidents, 104 of which were reportable.
There were no rapes or murders in 2012, Cunningham said.
Laura Van Wert is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5814 or at email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.