Baldwin-Whitehall District policy cited in denial of Duquesne students
Baldwin-Whitehall is the most recent school district to deny voluntarily accepting students in grades kindergarten through six from the Duquesne School District.
Superintendent Randal Lutz said on March 6 that the district submitted a letter to Duquesne School District officials stating that Baldwin-Whitehall is unable to accept students for a tuition payment of $8,000 per student because it is against district policy.
Duquesne School District's recovery plan includes disbursing 350 students to 11 districts within a 10-mile radius.
District officials released a draft of the 2013-14 school calendar. Proposed are starting the 2013-14 school year on Sept. 3; graduation, June 10, 2014; and building in six two-hour delay days throughout the year for clerical work and professional development. The school board must vote to approve a final calendar.
The Baldwin-Whitehall School Board also approved the hiring of John Wolicki as interim principal at Baldwin High School for a salary of $350 per day, for no more than 45 days.
Wolicki, of Latrobe, is filling in for principal Kevin O'Toole, who took a leave of absence in January for the spring semester, citing personal reasons.
The school board also approved the hiring of Ann Bisignani, of School House Consultants, for consulting services at Baldwin High School at a cost of $300 per day during a 30-day period; and Otto Graf, an education consultant, for $2,500 through June 2013.
Laura Van Wert is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5814 or at email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.