Fire pit regulations need adjusting in Whitehall
Tweaks are needed to an ordinance that would regulate outdoor burning in Whitehall before it can be brought before council for final adoption, the borough solicitor says.
Solicitor Irving Firman last week told council members that several changes need to be made to an ordinance that outlines size limits for fire pits, the distance they can be located from a structure and times open flames are allowed.
The proposed ordinance was released for public review last month.
Changes will include the elimination of some distance requirements in the rules, such as that grills must be 5 feet from the structure, borough manager James Leventry said.
Borough officials, also, have not adopted the most recent version of the International Fire Code, something that must be done in cohesion with the ordinance, Leventry said.
Once the changes are made, the ordinance will be released for public review again for an additional two weeks before being brought before council for final passage, Leventry said.
Residents' complaints about smoke from neighbors who were burning outside triggered Whitehall leaders to look at adopting such an ordinance, they said.
A switch in statewide earned-income-tax collection procedures last year, coupled with nearly every borough department coming in under budget, led Whitehall to finish 2012 without taking any funds from town's reserve.
Borough leaders had estimated $1.4 million would be used from the $4.2 million reserve at the end of 2012 to balance the budget.
The collection of earned income tax brought in almost $1.3 million more than budgeted, Councilman Robert McKown said.
The borough had budgeted $2.9 million in earned income tax receipts for 2012, Leventry said. Yet, the borough actually received $4.2 million in earned income tax collection last year.
Statewide changes to earned-income-tax collection went into effect at the beginning of 2012.
State Act 32 requires uniform withholding of earned income taxes and remittance to a single local collector for a given area.
Jordan Tax Service was selected to collect earned income taxes for the South Hills region. Berkheimer had collected the tax in Whitehall prior to the switch, Leventry said. Whitehall has budgeted $3.3 million for the collection of earned income taxes in 2013, Leventry said.
Borough officials plan to use $834,000 from the reserve at the end of 2013.
Ten streets are set to be paved in Whitehall this year as part of the 2013 road improvement program.
Borough council, in a unanimous vote last week, agreed to a contract with El Grande Industries for $695,325 to complete the project.
The project will come in under the $800,000 budget set for this year's program, which included about $50,000 for engineering work, Leventry said.
Stephanie Hacke is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5818 or email@example.com.
Whitehall Borough will celebrate “Earth Day” on April 20.
Borough council agreed last week to adopt that date for cleanup throughout the town.
Officials also discussed the idea of asking refugees from the Whitehall Place housing complex who participate in the Library with Easy Access Program to take part in cleanup of the town.
Help also will be sought from the Whitehall Lions Club and local boy scouts, officials said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.