Public meeting on future drilling in Jefferson Hills
The EQT Corp. will hold a public meeting in Jefferson Hills on Wednesday to explain a seismic testing project to map potential areas for future drilling.
The meeting will begin at 6:30 p.m. at the municipal building, located at 925 Old Clairton Road.
EQT Corp. and sub-contractor Cougar Land Services are conducting 3-D seismic surveys in Jefferson Hills and communities throughout the region to gain more information about Marcellus shale, which is rich with natural gas, said Allen Cohen, borough planner and zoning officer. Representatives with the companies have been going door-to-door in the borough to receive landowner permission to conduct the testing on individual properties.
Testing at a particular site does not necessarily mean that drilling will take place there or nearby, Cohen said.
Likewise, Jefferson Hills officials do not endorse the testing, but rather want to provide the opportunity for EQT representatives to address residents' questions and concerns, Cohen said.
“We're just helping to facilitate the meeting,” he said.
Jefferson Hills is waiting for the Supreme Court decision on Act 13, a law that limits the regulation of oil and gas drilling on the municipal level, before moving forward with its own ordinance addressing Marcellus shale activities, Cohen said.
“We're in a holding pattern with the ordinance,” Cohen said.
Laura Van Wert is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5814 or at email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.