Scouts among volunteers to help clean up South Park creek
Trout season along Peters Creek will begin this weekend with cleaner banks and stocked waters.
The Tri-Community Anglers Association and South Park Township worked with the Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, Montour Trail Council, Peters Creek Watershed and residents to organize a spring clean-up along the creek on April 6. About 30 volunteers picked up trash along Peters Creek, from Snowden Road to the other side of Green Man's Tunnel in Jefferson Hills.
“There are people all up and down the streams,” said Tim Schumann, one of the volunteers. “I think it's extremely important if we want to keep a stream like this in a suburban area.”
Walt Sackinsky, South Park Township supervisor and an angler, said the stream is stocked with rainbow trout, about $3 per fish worth, prior to the fishing season beginning.
“People don't realize how neat it is to have a national trout area here,” Sackinsky said.
Fishing in the creek is catch and release to protect the stock, he said.
“If you put it back, you can catch the same fish week after week,” Sackinsky said.
Bryan Egan, bear den leader for Pack 562, said this is the first time six of the boys participated in the clean-up. The Boy Scouts typically look for community and environmental projects.
“We were looking for something for the boys to do,” Egan said.
Terry Solomon, Girl Scout leader, said she was looking for a unique community service project.
“If nobody cleans the area up, it would be horrible,” Solomon said.
Laura Van Wert is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5814 or at email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.