Future problem solvers, Thomas Jefferson students make the grade at state level
Plastic filled the Pacific Ocean surrounding the Hawaiian Islands. It was harming the environment — likely killing fish, livestock and vegetation, students surmised.
The best way to fix the problem would be to submerge a clean-up device into the ocean to siphon out the plastic particles, the students agreed. Those, then, could be repurposed and turned into lumber and oil.
Although the situation was not real, students from across Pennsylvania were tasked with finding solutions for how to fix this potential international crisis during the statewide “Future Problem Solving” program last month.
Four girls from the West Jefferson Hills School District — Kaitlyn Salmon, Ashley Martier, Aleah Bousquet and Mary Rose Lowman — had the best solution, judges said, awarding them first place in the state.
They now will represent Pennsylvania in the international round of competition at Indiana University in Bloomington, Ind., in June, where they will compete against nearly 2,000 schools from across the world.
“I was about to cry. I said, ‘It was all worth it, even the broken ankle,'” said Martier, 15, a freshman at Thomas Jefferson High School.
Getting that state victory took months of preparations, studying, and even a twisted, possibly broken ankle, for the energetic team that has worked together since seventh grade at Pleasant Hills Middle School.
“The excitement is there all of the time. They're very passionate about it,” said Pleasant Hills Middle School gifted teacher Andrew Capretto, who has supervised the girls for the last three years.
The competition presents students with hypothetical future scenarios where trends today have gotten out of control. The scenarios are typically set between 20 and 50 years in the future. The students are given the topic, such as “Ocean Soup,” to study. But the scenario is not presented to them until the time of the competition.
The students must decide what the biggest problem is in the given scenario, then determine the best way to fix it. They also perform a “funny or dramatic” skit, acting out their solution — and that is how Martier possibly broke her ankle.
“We kind of just go crazy once we get into the (hotel room),” said Salmon, 15, a freshman at Thomas Jefferson.
Studying the topic takes months.
“We Google things, a lot,” said Bousquet, 15, a freshman at Oakland Catholic.
“I don't think I slept for a week before the competition,” Martier said. “They all slept in the car. I was up studying.”
The group meets after school twice a week at Thomas Jefferson High School to study the topic, brainstorm and prepare.
Working together for three years, they have things down to a science.
And each year working together, they have improved.
Three of the girls were on a team in sixth grade which came in fourth place in the state. In seventh grade, the girls finished third in the state. Last year, they were second.
That meant added pressure for this year's competition.
Salmon, 15, a freshman at Thomas Jefferson, remained calm the entire way.
“I figured we would get it. We had gotten better each year,” she said.
The others, though, were a bit more nervous.
“There was a lot of anxiousness this year,” Bousquet said.
The pressure is on again as they prepare for the international round. The goal is to be among the top 10 teams in the world.
They know this will be a challenge, they said. They're competing against teams from the United States, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Korea, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, India and Portugal.
Though the topic for this competition seems fitting for the all girls team, as it looks at the global status of women.
“I feel like we can relate more to this issue,” Bousquet said.
The girls are researching women's participation in government and religious practices.
They were surprised to find out, they said, that the United States does not have the highest rankings for women's freedoms, according to their research.
Stephanie Hacke is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5818 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.