Baldwin High School showered with Kelly nominations
Edna Turnblad, played by senior Greg Arcuri, and Tracy Turnblad, played by senior Maggie Brooks, practice their lines while in the women's penitentiary during rehearsal for Baldwin High School's production of 'Hairspray.'
Photo by Randy Jarosz | For The South Hills Record
The shiny lights, carefully crafted scenes, actor performances and harmonic melodies of this year's Baldwin High School spring musical “Hairspray” earned the cast and crew six nominations from Pittsburgh's Civic Light Opera's 2013 Gene Kelly Awards.
The Gene Kelly Awards for Excellence in High School Musical Theater, launched in 1991, recognizes students achievement in musical theater and arts education.
Baldwin High School's nominations this year included:
• Best musical — budget category III
• Best actress — Maggie Brooks for her role as Tracy Turnblad
• Best supporting actor — Greg Arcuri for his role as Edna Turnblad
• Best ensemble
• Best lighting design — budget category III
• Best scenic design — budget category III
Nominees for best actor and best actress will compete for the opportunity to represent the Pittsburgh CLO Gene Kelly Awards at the National High School Musical Theater Awards in New York City on July 1.
Pittsburgh CLO's 23rd Annual Gene Kelly Awards will be held on May 25 at the Benedum Center for the Performing Arts at 7:30 p.m.
Stephanie Hacke is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5818 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.