Baldwin-Whitehall School District officials balance budget
Baldwin-Whitehall residents can expect a millage reduction for 2013-14, but that does not necessarily mean their taxes will follow suit.
As of June 5, the district's real estate tax is expected to decrease from 24.3 mills to 19.61 mills. The number is set to stay the same as the budget must be submitted to the Pennsylvania Department of Education by July 15.
“The reassessments readjusted the millage for us,” said Mark Cherpak, the district's business manager. “It doesn't mean taxes will go down. It depends on their individual reassessment.”
The school district will be able to preserve its savings and still balance this year's budget with the help of a 3.5-percent increase in state subsidies coming to about $240,000 and a 20- to 25-percent increase in earned income tax revenue, which will bring the school district an additional $600,000 to $800,000, officials said.
The school board was set to vote on the finalized budget of $60.3 million on Wednesday, after the South Hills Record's deadline.
An additional meeting is scheduled for June 19 at 7 p.m., but it is designated to tie up loose ends unrelated to the budget because there will be no school board meetings in July.
Brittany Goncar is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5803 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.