Share This Page

Write-ins give Baldwin Borough incumbents another chance

| Thursday, June 13, 2013, 1:36 p.m.

Three Baldwin Borough council incumbents who failed to receive their party's nomination for open seats on council and a bout at the mayoral post in the May Primary could have another shot at a re-election bid.

Officials at the Allegheny County Department of Elections said on Friday that they were still compiling results for write-in votes from around the region.

Yet, unofficial results for the Republican nomination for four open Baldwin Borough Council seats showed incumbents Robert Collet and Larry Brown receiving the most write-in votes for the party nomination, with 38 and 34 votes, respectively. Collet and Brown, who have served on Baldwin council for the last four years, failed to receive the Democratic nomination in May yet now could appear on the Republican ballot in November.

“I think it's fantastic,” Collet said. “We got through the Primary and we're in the main game now. Everybody starts at zero now, just like in sports when you head into the playoffs, everyone is on an equal playing field.”

Other top Republican write-in vote getters, according to county elections representatives, were four-year Baldwin Borough Council incumbent John Conley, who received 26 votes, and Baldwin-Whitehall School Board member Kevin Fischer, with 24 votes.

The top candidates for each position will be sent a letter that will allow them to file for the write-in nomination, election division representatives said.

Seven candidates sought the Democratic party nomination in May. It was Fischer, Conley, Michael Ducker and Francis Scott, all of whom were endorsed by the Baldwin Borough Democratic Organization, that received the party nomination.

Ducker and Scott also received write-in votes for the Republican nomination, with 23 and 21 votes, respectively, which were not enough to capture a place on the November ballot on the Republican ticket.

Baldwin Borough Council President David Depretis bested four-year council incumbent Ed Moeller in the May primary as the two squared off in a contest to seek the Democratic party nomination for mayor, replacing retiring 16-year veteran Mayor Alexander Bennett.

Yet, it was Moeller who received the most write-in votes for mayor on the Republican ticket, election division officials said. Moeller received 64 write-in votes to Depretis' 51 votes.

Moeller said Monday that he had not received word that he had won the Republican party's nomination. But, if that is the case, he said, he likely would keep his name on the ballot “out of respect for those who voted” for him.

Losing the Democratic nomination was difficult for the entire Moeller family who put their all into getting Ed elected, he said.

“I think right now, I would at least be on the ballot and let all of the voters decide who they want as mayor,” Moeller said.

All results are unofficial until certified by the county elections department.

Stephanie Hacke is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5818 or shacke@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.