Baldwin-Whitehall Superintendent Randal Lutz was selected as the 2013 Junior Achievement of Western Pennsylvania Educator of the Year.
He is to be honored at a ceremony at 4 p.m. June 27 at the The Westin Convention Center Pittsburgh hotel.
“It's really an honor,” Lutz said. “It's a recognition for the district because of the work that so many people around the district do. It's a great organization.”
Educators are nominated for the award by school board members, teachers and staff involved with the Junior Achievement program.
Lutz grew up in Baldwin Borough and has held many roles in the school district as teacher, principal and coach. Superintendent for one year, Lutz said his goals are closely related to student growth and high academic achievement.
The district has been a longtime partner with Junior Achievement, but what stuck out was Lutz's support in bringing JA to the refugee community, said Dennis Gilfoyle, local JA president.
This included the involvement of current Pittsburgh University-Greater Allegheny sophomore Diwas Timsina. While at Baldwin, Timsina used his experiences with JA to educate students at Paynter Elementary School. He also was the recipient of the Robert J. Schuler Scholarship for $1,000.
“We've been giving out this award for 11-12 years, maybe even longer,” Gilfoyle said. “As the year went on, we were getting multiple nominations from different people for Dr. Lutz. It became pretty clear to us that he was the top choice.”
Brittany Goncar is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5803 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.