Fire company asks Baldwin residents to rally against department's consolidation
Leaders of Option Independent Fire Company are asking residents to rally together and tell borough officials they do not want the department to be consolidated or closed.
About 50 Baldwin Borough residents attended a public meeting held by the fire company on Wednesday night to learn more about what Option leaders said are potential plans by borough officials to close or consolidate the fire company.
“We are very concerned that things are shaping up very soon,” said Option Vice President Nancy Barylak.
Leaders from Option, one of three volunteer fire companies in Baldwin Borough, said talks at private meetings with borough leaders have become heated over the past several months. Rumors have begun to spread that Option will be closed in the next few months, fire company officials said.
This would not be a benefit to the borough, Barylak said, asking residents to sign a petition that will be given to borough council, urging them not to close or consolidate Option Independent. Lawyers for Option Independent and the now-defunct Becks Run Volunteer Fire Company, which borough leaders voted to decertify last year following charges of theft against some Becks Run leaders, filed a motion in Orphans Court in May, seeking a merger of assets.
Barylak said it was Becks Run leaders who approached Option Independent with the idea to merge assets.
“We want to take the first pick,” she said of Becks Runs' assets. “We're willing to share with the others.”
Baldwin Borough Mayor Alexander Bennett said there are no plans to close any of the municipality's three fire stations.
“Absolutely not,” he said. “We've never discussed closing any of the fire halls.”
Borough officials for many years ago asked the fire chiefs to review ways to share services, Bennett said. With changing situations, officials have discussed options of merging fire companies, he said.
Those plans, though, have been put on hold, due to the pending litigation in Orphan's Court, Bennett said.
“We're looking to better serve the public,” he said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.