Brentwood stadium track color will be red
The third time's a charm.
Brentwood Council re-voted to change the new track color at Brentwood Park to red after concerns voiced by members of the Brentwood Park Initiative at Tuesday's meeting.
Julie McCarthy, a director of the Brentwood Park Initiative, said the group supports the red track because of a $10,000 savings.
“Clay (red) is the common color,” McCarthy said. “It's a standard color choice. It will allow future repairs to be completed more quickly and possibly less expensively than a premium color.”
Council voted 4-2 in favor of the red track after approving a royal blue track in June. Councilmen Pasquale “Pat” Carnevale and Marty Vickless dissented. Councilwoman Ann Schade was absent.
Savings on the six-lane, 400-meter track will be about $10,000 from the base bid of $139,000 for the Plexitrac color blue.
“You are supposed to listen to the people out there that put you on the seat,” Mayor Ken Lockhart said. “If you are listening to the majority of the people say that's the color they want, that's up to council to come back and try to voice their opinion.”
Brittany Goncar is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5803 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.