ShareThis Page

Two police officers to be hired, two promoted in Brentwood

| Wednesday, July 24, 2013, 10:33 a.m.

Two Brentwood police officers were promoted on Tuesday night.

Council approved the promotion of Adam Zeppuhar of Baldwin Borough, in a 6-0 vote, and Matt DeLallo of Whitehall, in a 5-1 vote, to sergeant. Councilman Marty Vickless dissented.

Councilman Pasquale “Pat” Carnevale was absent.

Zeppuhar and DeLallo will join Sgt. John Vojtas as supervisors. Vojtas was the last officer to be promoted, in the late 1990s, said Chief Robert Butelli.

“It was long before I got here,” said Butelli, who has worked in the department since 2001. “We have been running with only one supervisor.”The new sergeants will supervise officers working second-shift and third-shift. They will receive about a 5-percent annual pay increase. Zeppuhar and DeLallo were selected due to several factors, including seniority and Civil Service test results.

Zeppuhar and DeLallo both are paid about $74,000 annually.

Council also approved a request from Butelli to hire two additional officers after the Civil Service Commission presents its list of eligible candidates. The vote passed 4-2 with councilmen Vickless and Rich Schubert dissented due to budget concerns.

“There is always opportunity to hire, that's not the question,” Schubert said. “The question is having the money for them.”

The department has 12 officers.

Brittany Goncar is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5803 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.