Baldwin teenager to face assault charges
A Baldwin Borough teenager is accused of robbing a woman as she walked alone on Churchview Avenue in Brentwood earlier this month.
The boy, 16, was charged as an adult with simple assault, aggravated assault, recklessly endangering another, unlawful restraint and robbery on July 17 in connection with the incident, Brentwood Chief Robert Butelli said.
This was the second arrest Brentwood police have made in connection with assaults in the area during the last several weeks.
Four assaults were reported in the Sankey, Pyramid and Churchview avenue areas of Brentwood earlier this month, Butelli said. Other robberies occurred in the same vicinity in the City of Pittsburgh. Victims reported that a man approached them from behind and snatched money from them.
Neither of the two arrested so far have been connected to the other robberies, or each other, Butelli said. “We still caution residents to be on guard and be vigilant,” Brentwood Office Matthew DeLallo said. “With these two arrests, we feel the area is much safer. We continue to seek a connection to the other (assaults).”
Police declined to release the boy's name. He faced a preliminary hearing before Judge Donna Jo McDaniel Wednesday, after the South Hills Record's deadline.
Brentwood police on July 10 charged Khari Williams, 18, with robbery, aggravated assault, carrying a firearm without a license and recklessly endangering another person in connection with an early-morning assault on Pyramid Avenue on June 8.
An assault on a male on Churchview Avenue in Baldwin Borough earlier this month remains under investigation, police Chief Michael Scott said Tuesday.
Stephanie Hacke is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5818 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.