New sign sends Baldwin Borough scrambling to get billboard policy in place
The erection of a large sign adjacent to the Loose Moose Saloon on Brownsville Road, advertising the opening of a car dealership, alerted Baldwin Borough officials to their lack of restrictions for signage and billboards.
“We've got to change that,” borough manager John Barrett said. “The bottom line is, we have to do something and get some rules in place.”
Baldwin Borough officials now are looking at amending the borough's sign ordinance to introduce regulations for billboards, something the borough code previously lacked. The borough code has requirements only for the square-footage of signage allowed on each parcel, Barrett said.
“We don't account for them in any fashion,” Barrett said. “The word (billboard) is used interchangeably with ‘sign' in the borough code.”
The borough manager said he looked at the borough code when an application was made to put up a sign near the Loose Moose property. Barrett said he initially thought the sign might not meet borough code because of an existing sign on the property.
“That sign conforms because it's actually on a separate parcel,” he said.
Another billboard-style sign — advertising the same car dealership — was erected in the rear of the Sugar & Spice Ice Cream shop parking lot.
Baldwin officials do have regulations in place for LED signs, Barrett said.
“If that was LED, we would have a say,” he said.
A consultant who is working to complete a comprehensive plan for Baldwin Borough is looking at sample billboard ordinances that could apply in Baldwin, Barrett said.
Barrett said he hopes to have an ordinance for council to review in October.
Stephanie Hacke is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5818 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.