ShareThis Page

Deer needs human intervention to escape hole in Brentwood

| Wednesday, Aug. 21, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
This deer fell into a 7-foot hole at Brentwood Park and had to be extracated by members of the Brentwood police and public works department. The deer evidently did not see the hole, fell into it and had to depend on human intervention.

A white-tailed doe was rescued from a 7-foot hole on Saturday with the help of the tender hands — and large scaled machines — of Brentwood fire, police and public work crews and state game commission wardens.

Officials responded to Brentwood Park shortly after 8:30 a.m. Saturday for a report that a deer was stuck in a hole that was left open in a construction area above the municipal pool, police Sgt. Matthew DeLallo said.

Crews, including DeLallo, public works superintendent Robert Machewich, backhoe operator Shawn Frey and Brentwood Volunteer Fire Company assistant chief Jack Loeffel and second assistant chief Rich Collavo, worked together to save the deer. They used a backhoe, creating a parallel hole so the dirt would not collapse on the deer, DeLallo said.

Straps used by the fire crews kept slipping off of the deer, so Loeffel and an assistant game warden had to jump into the hole and push and pull the deer out with their hands, DeLallo said.

After several hours, the deer appeared uninjured and walked away from the scene, he said.

“The last we saw the deer, it was walking off into Brentwood Park on its own,” DeLallo said. “Everybody came together and worked as a team. Everybody just truly cared.”

Stephanie Hacke is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5818 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.