Share This Page

Upgrades coming to Whitehall intersection

| Wednesday, Sept. 11, 2013, 9:01 p.m.
Randy Jarosz | For The South Hills Record
The intersection at Streets Run and Brownsville roads in Whitehall.
The intersection at Streets Run and Brownsville roads in Whitehall.

The sometimes confusing lines, signs and arrows directing traffic from Streets Run Road onto Brownsville Road will be repainted and replaced to help clarify the intersection for drivers struggling to know exactly in which lane they belong, Whitehall leaders said this week.

The Allegheny County Department of Public Works, which maintains the intersection, responded to a request from Whitehall leaders to make improvements at the intersection, Mayor James Nowalk said.

Although county officials said they will not consider a redesign of the intersection, as requested, they will repaint directional arrows and reinstall damaged signs at the intersection in the next several weeks, they said in a letter to the Whitehall mayor.

“Because of your letter, this intersection is going to become more safe,” Nowalk last week said to Whitehall resident Raymond Meenan, who prompted the discussion by sending the mayor a letter asking that improvements be made at the intersection.

“I jog there all the time, and I see it,” said Meenan, who attended the meeting to protest local officials and ask for a $20,000 check from the borough to be reimbursed for legal fees he has incurred over the years in actions against Whitehall.

The resident's letter prompted Nowalk to look at issues at the intersection, the mayor said. He realized there was a problem.

“I have, myself, come close to going in the wrong lane, at times,” Nowalk said.

Directional signs at the intersection is “inadequate” and does not clearly guide drivers trying to make a left turn, he said. Because of the design, many times drivers end up in the wrong lane, which, the mayor said in his letter, he fears could lead to a head-on collision.

Large trucks, also, cannot properly make the turn and often go over the center island, he said in the letter. Since 1995, the Whitehall Police Department has notified Allegheny County 22 times that directional signs at the intersection were struck, damaged, knocked down or missing.

Nowalk sought a redesign of the intersection, but county officials said a realignment took place in 1984 as part of a state-funded bridge-replacement project. County funds, then, would have to support a redesign, and the bridge — which is not weight restricted — only needs minimal repairs to have a fair to good rating, the response states.

County public works officials will repaint the intersection in the next 30 days, Nowalk said.

The mayor said this is a good example of how local government should work — when residents see a problem, they contact their local representative, and action is taken — and reinforces the need for small community governments.

“There's personal contact with local officials,” Nowalk said. “People in the City of Pittsburgh cannot pick up their phone and call Mayor Luke Ravenstahl.”

Residents can and often do prompt changes in local towns, Nowalk said.

“Sometimes you need a little impetus,” he said.

Residents can contact officials by phone, letter or email to let them know about changes they want to see, the mayor said.

“People can affect what happens,” Nowalk said.

Stephanie Hacke is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5818 or shacke@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.