ShareThis Page

Property value tumbles; owners request rezoning for the former Whitehall Country Club site

| Wednesday, Sept. 25, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Chuck and Patty Hosler had big dreams for the 4.5-acre haven on Provost Road in Whitehall.

In the summer, families would spend time together at the former Whitehall Country Club site and children would play in the the 25-meter pool. Baseball games would be played year-round inside a new building and the Holsers' martial arts school, Rising Sun, would move from Baldwin Borough to the property.

“That's when the financial situation hit,” said Chuck Hosler, 49, of Bethel Park.

The Hoslers tried unsuccessfully to secure a loan for the project as the economy struggled, then gave up on their vision about two years ago and put the property up for sale. Now, they're asking Whitehall leaders to rezone the land to make it more attractive to developers or other prospective buyers.

Chuck Hosler said the couple has had trouble selling the former Whitehall Country Club site, which they purchased under the name Rising Sun Martial Arts Inc. in 2009 for about $150,000. They invest as much as $10,000 a year into the property, he said.

Allegheny County real estate records show the property sold for $72,000, but Chuck Hosler said the couple also had to buy out the country club's remaining shareholders and invest in improvements before the purchase was finalized.

Whitehall Country Club opened in 1959 and close in 2008 because of dwindling membership.

The Hoslers opened the pool and tennis courts in 2010 under the name The Pool at Rising Sun Fitness Center.

After that summer, Chuck Hosler said, they realized they couldn't afford to keep operating the pool and listed the property for sale.

The current zoning, classified as R2-S, hasn't helped to attract potential buyers, he said, and he and selling agent John Thatcher of All Pittsburgh Real Estate pleaded with Whitehall Council last week to proceed with the rezoning.

A public hearing on the potential rezoning of five properties along Provost Road, including the former country club, initially was scheduled last week, but was postponed so that land surveying could be completed, borough Manager James Leventry said. The hearing likely will be rescheduled for November.

Whitehall officials are considering rezoning the properties as R2-AS, a residential category that allows four single-family dwellings or 12 town houses to be built per acre. Properties that would be rezoned include the former country club and 50 townhouses on Shadow Drive.

“We're looking for this to expand the possibility of the way that site can be developed,” Thatcher said.

The property is listed for sale for $179,000 and while there have been several offers, all fell through at the last minute, Thatcher said.

“We're looking for either a person that wants to put in one nice custom home — in which case you wouldn't need to rezone the property — or an upscale development that can put in a limited number of town homes on the property,” Thatcher said.

The court-ordered Allegheny County reassessments also posed a problem for a potential sale. The former country club's value was increased from $110,000 to $870,000, Chuck Hosler said.

After appeals, the value was dropped several times to $243,000, but in the meantime, a buyer was lost, Thatcher said.

While Whitehall considers the property as residential, Allegheny County classifies it as commercial because of the pool, Thatcher said. That, too, has been an issue while trying to sell the site, he said.

The Hoslers hope to keep the property intact, at least what's left of it. All the copper piping was taken, and skateboarders have been caught on the property, Chuck Hosler said.

“Yesterday,” Chuck said. “That's when we need it to sell.”

Stephanie Hacke is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5818 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.