ShareThis Page

Whitehall library's quilt covers history, shares stories of patrons

| Wednesday, Oct. 9, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

A large, multicolored quilt now hangs above the reference desk in the Whitehall Public Library. The titles of 60 books outlined in the 50th anniversary memorabilia help to share stories that are meaningful in the lives of residents and library supporters.

“It was really a community effort,” Whitehall Public Library director Paula Kelly said.

The Whitehall Public Library 50th anniversary quilt, which was unveiled at the library's anniversary celebration in May, made its debut in the borough library on Oct. 4, hanging from a curtain rod.

The quilt is the brainchild of Alfie Chico, a library volunteer, patron and Friends of the Whitehall Public Library member. It was crafted during the last year and a half to commemorate the library's golden anniversary.

Working alongside quilt designer and Whitehall resident Sue Cook and library board trustee and quilter Deb Recker, the three ladies sought resident donations of $100 for the library in exchange for a book title to be placed on the quilt, which was put together by Whitehall resident Cathy Werner.

Book titles, selected by library supporters, ranged from Stephen King's “The Stand” to “The Holy Bible,” Kelly said.

“And everything in between,” she said.

The most popular title, selected by three groups, was Harper Lee's “To Kill A Mockingbird,” Kelly said.

A book that accompanies the quilt explains why each person or group selected the titles.

“It made it really personal and interesting,” Kelly said. “A lot of parents selected (the titles) because they were books that they read to their children.”

The quilt raised more than $4,000 for the library.

Stephanie Hacke is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5818 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.