Carnegie looks at wide range of fee increases
As budget discussions in Carnegie continue, borough council turned its attention to revenue during Monday night's meeting.
Discussions included proposals for several increased fees throughout the borough, but the final budget will not be voted on until later this year.
Included in proposed fee increases are demolition fees, curb cutting fees, council chamber rentals and security deposits, solicitation fees, and Dumpster fees.
Under the proposals, demolition fees would increase from $50 to $75, curb-cutting fees would increase from $25 to $50, and dumpster fees would go up from $100 to $125.
The proposed increase for the rental of council chambers for public or private events would increase the rental fee to $200 for borough residents and $250 for non-residents. The security deposit would increase to $200.
Council also looked at an increase to its solicitation fee — that is, the fee assessed for solicitation by for-profit organizations.
The fee is $2 per person per day.
The proposed increase looked at raising that to $250 per person per month.
Council also discussed ways to better enforce fees against vacant properties. Fines for properties that are vacant for a year or more and not for sale are $250 for residential properties and $400 for commercial properties.
So far in 2013, the borough has collected $1,400 in vacant property fines.
Council will hold final budget discussions at 6 p.m. Nov. 18.
They are expected to vote on the final budget numbers in December.
Megan Guza is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5810 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.