Share This Page

Baldwin councilman ready to move on after day in court

| Wednesday, Oct. 30, 2013, 10:42 a.m.

A Baldwin Borough councilman who admitted to stealing $11 in mulch from the town pleaded guilty to a summary disorderly conduct charge in an effort to put the case behind him, his lawyer said Wednesday.

John “Butch” Ferris, 69, a longterm Baldwin councilman, had misdemeanor charges of theft by unlawful taking and receiving stolen property withdrawn on Wednesday in district Judge Pat Capolupo's Pleasant Hills courtroom.

Baldwin Borough district Judge John Bova recused himself from the case.

Ferris instead pleaded guilty to a disorderly conduct charge and agreed to pay $11 in restitution to Baldwin Borough for the theft. He also will pay a $100 fine and court costs.

Ferris declined to comment.

“He just wanted to be finished with the whole charge,” said Ferris' attorney Michael Niznik, of the Law Offices of Justin J. Ketchel, LLC.

Baldwin solicitor Michael Lederman said that “nothing happens automatically” to Ferris' seat on council based on his plea.

Baldwin police in August filed charges against Ferris, who at the time oversaw the borough's public works committee, after he admitted to taking half a cubic yard of industrial grade mulch — which had been bought by the borough — from Colewood Park.

Ferris, during a council meeting in August, admitted to taking the mulch and returned it to the borough.

Stephanie Hacke is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5818 or shacke@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.