Refinancing bonds could save $350K for Baldwin-Whitehall
The refinancing of nearly $10 million in bonds, issued in 2007, could help to save more than $350,000 for the Baldwin-Whitehall School District this school year.
Board members last week, in a unanimous vote at their Nov. 13 meeting, approved the refinancing, presented by Public Financial Management representative Jamie Doyle.
The savings of a portion of the 2007 series bond will bring in about $362,000 to the district in the 2013-14 school year, business manager Mark Cherpak said.
Another bond refinancing is planned for December 2014 for another portion of the 2007 bonds that will result in an additional savings of about $310,000 to the district, Cherpak said. The refinancing of 2009 bonds in August 2014 also is projected to save the district about $353,000, he said.
Police chiefs, parents and school officials will work together to solve traffic issues in the Baldwin-Whitehall School District.
School board members last week in a unanimous vote approved members for a committee.
The committee will include Whitehall police Deputy Chief Richard Danko, Baldwin High School Principal Walter Graves, Baldwin Borough police Chief Michael Scott, athletic director Vincent Sortino, facilities director Paul Svirbel, transportation manager Ken Pokorny, board member Larry Pantuso and several parents.
A group of students, parents, alumni and community members are sought to help prepare for the Baldwin-Whitehall School District's diamond anniversary next year.
As the district turns 75 years old in 2014, district officials plan to work with stakeholders to prepare an event to recognize this occasion, Superintendent Randal Lutz said.
School board members approved the formation of a committee to help with the anniversary plans.
Stephanie Hacke is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5818 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.