Pleasant Hills, employees reach contract agreement
A contract more than two years in the works between nonuniform employees and Pleasant Hills Borough received council's stamp of approval Monday night.
Borough Council, in a 4-0 vote, authorized the execution of a collective bargaining unit with the Utility Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO, Local 433, which represents office workers, public works employees, police clerk and Pleasant Hills Authority employees.
Council President Brad Rodeheaver, Vice President Dan Soltesz and Councilman Greg Smith were absent.
“I think it's a good document that protects the borough and protects the employees,” said Councilman Bill Trimbath, who oversaw Monday's meeting. “We were just looking for it to be fair for both sides.”
Union leaders could not be reached for comment.
The contract is retroactive to January and runs through the end of 2015, borough Manager Deborah Englert said. Salary raises will be retroactive to May.
The contract outlines a 3 percent raise for employees in 2013 and 2.5 percent in both 2014 and 2015, Englert said.
This was the first contract for the Pleasant Hills employees represented by Local 433, solicitor Fred Jug said.
Negotiations have been ongoing for about 20 months, Trimbath said. There are roughly 30 people represented by the union.
“It covers four different groups of employees and since it was their first contract, it took longer,” he said.
Stephanie Hacke is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5818 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.