Brentwood school board election winners sworn in
A Brentwood mother of three said she wants to help her community by serving on the board of school directors.
Amy Hayden, 36, won a write-in campaign on Nov. 5 to serve a two-year term on the Brentwood Borough School Board. She was sworn into office Tuesday at the board's reorganizational meeting, along with incumbents Dale Johnson, Sarah Komlenic, Gary Topolosky and Donna Werner.
Each of them won four-year seats in the Nov. 5 election.
No one ran on the Republican or Democratic tickets for the two-year open seat.
“I wanted to give back to the community,” Hayden said. “This is the best way that I could think of doing it. The children are the most important part of Brentwood. A lot of people grew up in Brentwood and stayed here, so why not make it better for the future.”
Hayden has served in the Elroy Elementary School parent-teacher association. As a mother of children attending three Brentwood schools, Hayden said serving on the school board will provide her with the opportunity to help affect education at all levels in Brentwood.
“With kids in all three schools, I wanted to be able to contribute to all of Brentwood's educational system,” she said. Hayden and her husband, Ed, have lived in Brentwood for 10 years. Her children are Celest, 15; Thomas, 12; and Aeryn, 6.
School board members, in a unanimous vote, reappointed their colleague Robert Kircher to serve as board president for the upcoming year.
Roger Gaughan was appointed by his colleagues, also in a unanimous vote, to serves as the board's vice president for the upcoming school year. That position was held by board member David Schaap.
Stephanie Hacke is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5818 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.