New contract OK'd for Brentwood Borough School support staff
The nearly 45 support staffers in the Brentwood Borough School District are working under a new contract, more than five months after their previous pact expired.
School board members, in a unanimous vote last week, approved a collective-bargaining agreement with the Brentwood Education Support Professionals Association, or BESPA, retroactive to July 1, 2013, and going through June 30, 2017.
“We believe it's a fair contract for the association members and for the district,” district solicitor John Vogel said.
The union ratified the agreement on Dec. 8, Paul Girdany, Pennsylvania State Education Association UniServ representative for the union, said in an email.
A four-year contract for BESPA members — including paraprofessionals, secretaries, custodians, maintenance staff and cafeteria workers — ended June 30.
In October, about 20 staffers attended a school-board meeting with signs and matching pins asking for a new contract after they said talks had stalled.
The contract provides between 2.4- and 2.8-percent annual increases for the union's nearly 45 employees, Vogel said.
“All employees are going to be contributing more for their health care,” Vogel said. “That was an important goal of the district.”
Stephanie Hacke is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5818 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.