Budget approved by Baldwin Borough Council
Real estate taxes will remain the same for Baldwin Borough residents in 2014.
Council members Tuesday approved the borough's spending plan for next year in a 5-2 vote that includes a nearly $9.8 million general fund, $7.2 million sewage fund, $369,623 highway aid fund and $128,623 swimming pool fund.
Council members Bob Collet and Larry Brown, both who have advocated for more funds to be spent on the borough's road program next year, dissented. The road program for 2014 is set at $800,000.
“It's really a maintenance budget,” borough Manager John Barrett said, noting the budget does not include many changes from 2013.
Council approved the tax rate for 2014 at 5.41 mills, in a 6-1 vote. Councilman John “Butch” Ferris dissented. One mill in Baldwin brings in about $739,000.
Council approved the borough's $8.5 million, five-year capital improvement program — from 2014 to 2018.
Sewage rates for 2014 will remain the same at $8.85 per 1,000 gallons with a monthly surcharge of $6.75.
The borough's sewage fund was able to absorb a proposed 17-percent rate increase from Alcosan that equals about $300,000 for Baldwin.
“I think our budget this year is a good compromise and it does provide for a lot of the needs,” council Vice President Michael Stelmasczyk said.
The budget allows for $15,000 to go toward the sharing of a recreation director with Brentwood, combines the budget for borough events, keeps funding the same for volunteer fire companies and reduces spending by about $233,000 for refuse collection for 2014.
Stephanie Hacke is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5818 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.