ShareThis Page

Proposed budget includes security upgrade at Whitehall municipal building

| Wednesday, Jan. 1, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

Additional surveillance cameras planned for installation at Whitehall's municipal building are intended to boost safety for staff and residents.

The cameras, part of a recommendation from a consultant who toured borough facilities in October in an effort to improve security, will be connected to the Whitehall Police Department. Officers will have the ability to monitor the feeds, borough Manager James Leventry said.

The cameras and other security upgrades estimated to cost a total $120,000 likely will be implemented early in 2014 at the municipal complex, the manager said. Council members on Dec. 18 agreed to seek bids for the security measures.

Bids likely will be sought in early January, Leventry said.

Borough leaders included $120,000 for improvements in the 2014 budget that also was approved by council in a unanimous vote on Dec. 18.

The $15.2 million 2014 budget includes a $9.3 million general fund and $5.7 million sewer fund, but doesn't have many substantial changes from the 2013 spending plan, officials said.

The 2014 budget includes about $805,000 to be spent on road improvements, and puts $90,000 in reserve for a future vehicle purchase for the Whitehall Fire Company.

The budget also increases borough contributions for the Whitehall Public Library by 3 percent in 2014, to $347,225.

A real estate tax rate likely will be set in January, when officials receive the borough's property reassessment numbers for 2013, Leventry said.

Whitehall leaders in 2012 were conservative when estimating the tax rate for 2013, they said. A countywide reassessment prompted the borough to reduce its tax rate from 5.5 mills in 2012 to 4.32 mills in 2013.

Municipalities in Allegheny County were required to change their property tax rates to become “revenue neutral,” based on final certified reassessed values.

Whitehall's total assessed property value for 2013 was about $810 million, up from roughly $650 million in 2012, officials said. Municipalities were allowed to take a 5 percent “windfall” in 2013, but Whitehall officials opted against this.

Because of that, the borough brought in about $3.2 million in property tax revenues in 2013, down $100,000 from $3.3 million collected previously. Officials are waiting on final 2013 reassessment numbers before setting the 2014 real estate tax rate, Leventry said.

Stephanie Hacke is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5818 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.