Vacant seat first task of 2014 for Baldwin Borough Council
Baldwin Borough Council members will discuss next week how they plan to proceed with filling a two-year vacancy on the board.
The options: Advertise the open seat, or discuss possible appointments, borough manager John Barrett said.
Council members meet on Tuesday at 7:30 p.m. in council chambers for their agenda-setting meeting.
They have 30 days to fill the open seat created Monday night, when former council President David Depretis resigned his seat to be sworn in as Baldwin's mayor. Depretis, a Democrat, won a four-year term as Baldwin's mayor in the November election.
Depretis had two years left on his council seat. He was sworn in as Baldwin's mayor Monday by Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas Judge Mark Tranquilli.
Council incumbents John Conley and Michael Ducker were sworn in for a four-year term on borough council Monday night, along with former Baldwin-Whitehall School Board member Kevin Fischer and Francis Scott, all Democrats.
Council members elected Michael Stelmasczyk as council president. Conley was elected council vice president, and Ducker was appointed president pro-tem.
Council members opted to make no changes to the 2014 budget that was approved in December.
Council members also were appointed to oversee various committees for 2014 that includes: Fischer for the finance committee; Stelmasczyk for parks and recreation; Ducker for public safety and to serve on the Baldwin Emergency Medical Services board of directors; Conley for planning commission and zoning hearing board liaison; and Scott for personnel.
Barrett will read the monthly public-works reports, and a library-board representative will be named in the future.
Stephanie Hacke is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5818 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.