August completion targeted for Jefferson Hills DPW complex
Construction on a public works complex in Jefferson Hills Borough has been progressingn on schedule since the groundbreaking on Sept. 9.
Excavation work has been completed on the $14.1 million project, and footings will be laid in the next week, said Tom Lovell, the borough's public works director, in his report to council on Jan. 8. Sections of the prefabricated building should be delivered on Jan. 17.
The complex, which is expected to be complete in August, will be adjacent to the municipal center on Old Clairton Road, and will have capacity to house 18 vehicles and equipment. In addition to a salt storage facility, a maintenance garage with three bays also is being built.
General Industries is handling general construction, while Gateway Engineers Inc. is the site engineering firm. McLean Architects, LLC designed the complex. Lovell and Mark Reis, the borough's building inspector, work closely with representatives of the firms.
In addition to Lovell's report to council, Joe Sites, engineer with Gateway, offered a project summary.
James Weber, vice president of council, asked him for a “scope-of-the-work document” to determine if any of the work could be handled by public works personnel to save money for the borough. The document also would keep everyone apprised of the construction phases, he said.
“We have been getting monthly reports from the engineer and Tom,” said Christopher King, council president. “We'd like an outlined agenda going forward to keep us informed.”
With only a few change orders having been written, King said, council is being vigilant.
“We vetted this thing out,” he said. “We want to be as stringent as we can to hold to the budget.”
Dona S. Dreeland is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5803 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.