Assessment appeals result in Pleasant Hills millage hike
By Dona S. Dreeland
Published: Wednesday, Jan. 22, 2014, 9:01 p.m.
After reopening the borough's $7 million budget, Pleasant Hills Council unanimously approved a 0.428-mill property tax increase.
The change approved on Jan. 20 brings the tax rate to 5.75 mills — the first increase since 2006. One mill now generates $589,465 in tax revenue.
Finance committee Chairman Joe Esper described the new budget as “revenue neutral.”
The previously-approved budget projected expenses at $7.1 million and revenues at nearly $6.2 million. The new budget is $7.1 million, revenues are projected at $6.5 million, and the shortfall is projected to be $575,823.
“We made cuts, so that the dollars are spent wisely,” said council President Dan Soltesz.
Allegheny County's assessment appeals process tells part of the story.
“Because of (assessment) appeals, the value of the mill has decreased,” Soltesz said. “We had to increase the millage to stay where we are.”
Although the appeals process has slowed, some reassessments and revenue fluctuations still are possible.
“The budget is a guide to determine tax rates. It's a fluid document,” Esper said.
Dona S. Dreeland is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5803 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Revised housing development plan submitted to Baldwin Borough officials
- Library in Jefferson Regional Medical Center packs a lot into five-shelf bookcase
- Baldwin police seeking two men suspected in robbery