Brentwood Council will tackle touchy field permit issues
By Stephanie Hacke
Published: Tuesday, Jan. 28, 2014, 4:39 p.m.
A vote will be taken next month outlining new permitting rules for the use of Brentwood facilities, officials guaranteed.
After months of heated discussion and resident pleas, council members say they will rule on how field permits will be distributed for municipal parks — and all borough facilities — on Feb. 17.
“I think it's time for us to take a vote on those two new fields,” Councilman Pat Carnevale said Monday, when he asked his colleagues to make a decision, as soon as that night. “We've been putting this off for far too long. It's time for us to be making our decision.”
Concerns over field usage time and borough permits escalated when a group of Brentwood parents and coaches recently formed the Brentwood Travel Baseball Association with plans of using fields in Brentwood Park this upcoming season.
The Brentwood Athletic Association, though, holds permits for the two older fields in the borough park through 2017, officials said. The BAA had a permit for four fields since the late 1990s, but the elimination of two fields and the building of two new ones in Brentwood Park led to discussion about whether the BAA has the right to all four, or just two, for the next four years, officials have said.
Officials have not determined if permits issued prior to the adoption of the new permitting rules with be honored, council President Marty Vickless said.
Council members in December tabled a vote to honor a request by the BAA to transfer permits from Winsor and Dailey field, which were torn down, to the two newly constructed fields in Brentwood Park.
The new permitting rules will create a hierarchy for the issuing of permits, Vickless said. The Brentwood Borough School District will be first in line to receive permits, he said.
“This has dragged on longer than I would have liked,” Vickless said, as he urged council members on Monday to wait until the procedures are reviewed by the borough solicitor and recreation committee to bring it up for approval. “I would rather hold off and do it correctly, rather than rush through it and end up with something that we have to keep revisiting, changing the rules on.... Just to vote on something isn't always the best thing.”
Council members said they worry that the delay in a decision is affecting the residents.
“It's not just the organizations that are a little bit on edge. It is the community and the children,” Councilwoman Stephanie Fox said. “My hesitation is that they're going to go to other boroughs because we don't have this finalized and it keeps getting delayed.”
Carnevale said if he were watching from the audience, he would be mad at the time it has taken officials to act.
“They just look at us like they're just putting it off and putting it off and putting it off. You just can't do that to people. If I was sitting some place and you were doing that to me, I'd be screaming at you from that pulpit. I'd be going through the ceiling. This just can't keep going on. You can't do that to people,” he said. “You're lucky I'm not standing on that side.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Garden Q&A: Firecracker vine OK for trellis?
- Starkey: Penguins’ arrogance astounding
- Matt Calvert’s goal in double OT evens series for Blue Jackets
- 1 dead, 1 wounded in shooting at Chartiers party
- Draftees’ longevity key for NFL success
- NFL notebook: Pryor will be cut if he’s not traded
- Pair of Braun homers spells defeat for Pirates
- Penguins’ Gibbons scores twice but leaves with apparent injury
- North Versailles, Murrysville families still waiting for report on 2011 chopper crash that killed couple
- Biertempfel: Kendall’s book offers inside look at life in majors
- State police: People injured in Parkway crash resulting from police chase