Share This Page

Cost soars for planned Pleasant Hills Authority treatment facility

| Wednesday, Feb. 12, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

Baldwin Borough officials want answers from the local sewer authority as to why the price of a planned treatment facility skyrocketed, they said.

Baldwin Borough Council members on Tuesday night said they initially were told the price of a proposed South Park Township sewage treatment facility in the Pleasant Hills Authority sewage system would be between $11.6 and $14 million — cost estimates coming from two engineering firms, one conducting an independent peer-review of the project.

Now, the projected cost has risen to $23.3 million.

And it will be up to the residents of Baldwin, Pleasant Hills, South Park Township and Whitehall, which contribute to the Pleasant Hills Authority, to make up for the cost.

The average Baldwin Borough resident likely would pay as much as $144 more per year than they do now with the treatment facility upgrades and the construction of a proposed pump station in Colewood Park, Baldwin Borough council President Michael Stelmasczyk said.

“That's unacceptable,” he said. “That makes no sense.”

The construction of the plant is part of a consent decree, as the four municipalities are working to comply with the state Department of Environmental Protection's consent decree to reduce overflow issues, Baldwin officials said.

Baldwin Borough leaders on Tuesday said they plan to ask for a meeting with leaders of the Pleasant Hills Authority to find out where the cost increase is coming from.

Pleasant Hills Borough Council members agreed on Monday night to send a letter to the authority asking for answers, said Baldwin engineer Larry Souleret, whose firm, Lennon, Smith & Souleret also serve's as Pleasant Hills' engineering firm.

“Ask them to tell you why,” Souleret said.

The only addition to the plans that were initially presented to the communities is flow monitors, estimated to cost $1 million, Souleret said.

Each contributory community and their planning commission is required as part of the consent decree to improve the plan.

Baldwin officials said they want answers before they will vote to accept the plan.

Pleasant Hills Authority will float a bond for the treatment facility upgrades, but the communities will have to back it, Stelmasczyk said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.