Baldwin-Whitehall board president: Hiring process 'flawed'
A move to name Baldwin-Whitehall School District's facilities director Paul Svirbel as the new director of operations moments after the job was created brought applause from the audience.
Yet the board member — who four months ago was appointed to a high-paying job that was not advertised and interviews were not conducted — objected to the process being used in this case.
Again, this job was not posted for public advertisement and the only interviews conducted were on-the-job, Superintendent Randal Lutz said.
“I have heard, I have listened and I have understood the outcries of people who want transparency and who want things in a process,” longtime school board member Martin Michael Schmotzer told his colleagues at their March 12 meeting. “I think when people talk about being upset, they talk about a process not being followed.”
Hundreds of residents have attended school board meetings during the last several months, seeking answers for the board's Nov. 19 actions to hire Schmotzer for a job moments after he resigned from his seat on the school board, agreeing to pay him $120,000 a year for five years. Two weeks later, Schmotzer resigned from the job, which he has said was needed because the district did not have a director of operations position, and was sworn in that night to a new term on the school board.
Board members discussed the shift in positions for Svirbel during two executive sessions, board President Larry Pantuso said.
“I asked four times and there was no problem with it. So if we're going to talk about process, then the whole process is flawed,” Pantuso said. “We shouldn't wait until this point…. If we're going to talk about a process, the process stinks.”
An initial motion to appoint Svirbel to the director of operations job was rescinded after Schmotzer pointed out there was no such job title in the district.
Board members unanimously approved the creation of the director of operations position that will oversee operations duties for the facilities department, as well as food services and transportation, Lutz said.
Board members, then, in an 8-1 vote, approved Svirbel for the job. Schmotzer was the lone dissenter. The job is a lateral move, Lutz said, holding Svirbel's salary at $87,418.
District officials will look to hire someone for the facilities manager job to assist Svirbel, Lutz said.
“In facilities, we have one person that's expected to supervise a 24-hour shift and have it supervised seven days a week,” Lutz said.
Board members eliminated a custodial manager job in October. The facilities department will be the same size as it was before that job elimination, Lutz said.
Svirbel, will be the “owner's representative” for projects, such as $800,000 planned for access upgrades at four schools, where construction is set to start this spring.
“By doing those things, it makes it difficult for him to run around to different buildings, checking to make sure desks are wiped and boards are cleaned,” Lutz said. “Yes, we do need to take a look at someone to assist him.”
The director of operations job includes “additional responsibilities, but it also is a change in responsibilities, so that he doesn't have to be the one making sure that snow is shoveled and weeds are cut,” Lutz said.
Whitehall resident Deb Baranowski said residents who have showed since November want transparency from the board.
She questioned why Svirbel already didn't have help.
A list, requested by Schmotzer in the last few months, looking at teachers who were “handed jobs,” or did not go through the appropriate process of interviews and advertisements, was completed. Yet, because the list has names of district employees, district officials said it was being withheld from the public.
Pantuso said the names of the teachers will be removed so the list can be given to the residents, with only positions showing.
Schmotzer said a list of administrators who were hired in a similar fashion will be sought next.
Stephanie Hacke is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5818 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.