Architectural firm could be selected for new Thomas Jefferson High School
Residents of the West Jefferson Hills School District will have the opportunity to participate in a school board discussion about the architectural firms that presented ideas for the new Thomas Jefferson High School.
The meeting is set for 6:30 p.m. May 1 at the high school. The board is expected to award a contract for the estimated $70 million project to one of the firms that night.
Out of a field of 14, five firms earned the building committee's recommendation and the school board's approval to interview for the job. The architects were asked to bring printed versions of their presentations and sealed bids.
Each presentation was based on information supplied by the district: geotechnical and environmental reports on the site and the facilities master plan completed in early 2013.
The board, committee members and Ryan Snodgrass, the district's new facility director, were eager to learn how the firms would keep residents informed about the process, who would serve as educational consultant during the project and if the firm would recommend the use of PlanCon, a state reimbursement procedure.
Via PowerPoint sketches, the architects focused on the 21st-century style of learning that would be reflected in the building's design.
Security is important, as are sustainability, high-tech connections and career training. The construction of the 225,000-square-foot school and district administration center will be on property adjacent to the existing administration building on Old Clairton Road.
District officials hope to have the project completed by September 2018.
Dona S. Dreeland is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5803 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.