Albino deer attracts attention in Pleasant Hills, Jefferson Hills
For the better part of two years, there has been a bit of magic every time the albino deer is spotted in Pleasant Hills and Jefferson Hills boroughs.
She nibbles through neighborhoods, as passers-by stop to watch and sometimes take pictures.
“Actually, they're fairly common, more than people think,” Jack Lucas, land-management supervisor with the Pennsylvania Game Commission, said about the albino deer.
He has seen dozens of such deer since he started working for the game commission in 1993.
The lack of body pigment is a genetic deficiency, he said. The white coat, pink eyes, nose and ears are caused by a lack of enzymes, which produce color.
While the white deer might look different than the white-tailed deer, they have the same habits and the same lifespan. This particular deer has been seen gathering with others.
Tom Lovell, public works director from Jefferson Hills, was able to take a photo of the albino deer.
“It's a doe,” he said, “and of breeding age.”
If she gives birth, her fawns could be regular white-tailed or albino, Lucas said. Or they might be a mix of white and brown.
“It's a happy little deer. It's been photographed 100, 1,000 times. Its eyes are red from flash burn,” Lovell said with a laugh.
But it's the camera that Lucas recommends when the albino deer comes into view.
“It's the fascination with the untameness of wildlife,” Lucas said, that makes people stop in wonder.
Dona S. Dreeland is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5803 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.