Pleasant Hills officials discuss deer management
Over the last few months, Pleasant Hills officials have heard complaints about managing the deer population.
In response, Gary Fujak, with the state game commission, laid out some options in his presentation to council last week, such as sterilization, birth control and controlled shoots.
Residents have complained about damage to gardens and shrubbery, wandering deer in quiet neighborhoods and occasional collisions during rutting season.
“Nobody on my street grows tulips anymore,” council President Dan Soltesz said.
The flowers become an appetizer for some passing deer, along with summer tomatoes.
“Deer management is an ongoing thing,” Fujak cautioned. “It needs to be done every year.”
The average lifespan of a deer is 10 to 12 years, he said. Each animal nibbles 5 to 10 pounds of vegetation a day to survive as it grazes within a 100- to 300-acre range.
But hunting with rifles could prove dangerous in a community where homes are so close, Fujak said. He recommended using experienced local archers who have purchased doe licenses. The use of archers in tree stands would add an element of safety.
While Fujak's talk was informative, council won't implement any management practices soon.
“There aren't many areas in the borough to manage the herd,” Soltesz said.
Dona S. Dreeland is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5803 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.