Consultant to help Brentwood Borough officials choose EMS provider
Brentwood officials plan to bring in a consultant to help choose between two emergency service providers.
Borough leaders are looking to hire a consultant as soon as next week to serve as an “EMS expert” to “take the lead and guide council” as they seek proposals from two local providers for the handling of the borough's emergency medical services, borough Manager George Zboyovsky said. The consultant has not been selected and a cost has not been determined, he said.
Requests for proposal were sent out last week, by invitation only, to Brentwood EMS, which has provided emergency medical services for the borough for the last 37 years, along with Medical Rescue Team South Authority, which provides services to Mt. Lebanon, Whitehall, Baldwin Township, Castle Shannon, Dormont and Green Tree, council President Marty Vickless said. The proposals, which will include information about response times, are due back to Brentwood leaders by Aug. 29.
Brentwood leaders broached the idea of exploring options for emergency medical services because Brentwood EMS' 10-year lease for space at the Brentwood Borough building was set to end July 31, Vickless told residents Monday.
Council members on Monday, in a 5-0 vote, agreed to allow Brentwood EMS to stay in its current space in the Brentwood Borough building until the building is not available as long as Brentwood EMS is selected as the borough's future EMS service. Council members Stephanie Fox and Dean Trent were absent.
“Our biggest concern, like always, is providing fast, quality emergency service to Brentwood Borough,” said director Joanne Cook, who added that EMS leaders will focus on filling out the proposal for the borough.
Brentwood Borough and Brentwood EMS agreed in 1993 that the organization would provide exclusive emergency services, documents show. The agreement requires a 90-day written termination notice by either party. The service employs 21 people.
Brentwood leaders are exploring locations for a new municipal building that would house the borough administration and police department and leaders have said there is no space and it would be too costly to house the EMS in the building.
Residents on Monday continued to plead with council members to save their longtime service provider. They voiced concerns that a switch to a neighboring service could increase response times.
“Seconds matter. Minutes matter,” said resident Joanne Smith, a former commissioner with the City of Pittsburgh Youth Commission. “You're risking children. You're risking lives and we're going to hold you accountable.”
At the meeting, some asked if requests for proposal for fire and police services would be next.
Vickless answered, “Possibly.”
That is cause for alarm, Smith said.
“Public safety comes before anything,” she said.
The requests for proposal do not have to be made available for public review until council votes on them, according to the Right to Know law, Zboyovsky said. If there is an interview process, the public will be invited to attend, he said.
Stephanie Hacke is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5818 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.