Valley News Dispatch Spotlight Athletes: Maria Pallone, Valley; Cole Quinio, Riverview
Sport: Girls tennis
Claim to fame: Pallone captured second place at Section 4-AA singles last week and qualified for the WPIAL tournament Thursday and Friday. Pallone has lost only twice in Section 4-AA, both to Lucy Bujdos of Indiana.
How much of a challenge has it been moving from No. 3 to No. 1 singles?
There's a lot of pressure and big shoes to fill. No. 1 is always expected to win.
What's your outlook on being the only senior starter?
I had such great examples when I started. Every senior set a good example for me. But I don't look at it as being anything special.
Does being the last in a line of Pallone siblings and cousins to play for Valley carry any extra pressure?
Everyone always refers to me as the youngest. But, if anything, it's always made me work harder, and I've always had someone to look up to.
Sport: Boys soccer
Claim to fame: Quinio, a four-year-starter, acts as a midfield playmaker for the resurgent Raiders, who are in second place in Section 2-A. The 17-year-old is garnering interest from Division I schools, including a scholarship offer from Marshall.
Who do you model your game after?
David Beckham (of the Los Angeles Galaxy). I would basically say I base my game off how he plays. I'm not super fast, but I have a pretty hard, accurate shot.
Did you ever consciously decide to become more of a set-up man?
When I was going from 10th grade into 11th, that's when the switch flipped for me. I realized that I'm not much of a goal scorer. I'm much better at putting crosses into the box.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.