Yough School Board awards district roofing bids
The Yough School Board last week awarded roofing contracts to two companies for the roofs of the three elementary buildings.
Blair Roofing was awarded the contract for H.W. Good Elementary in the amount of $623,448 and for West Newton Elementary in the amount of $725,873. Both projects are to be completed this year.
Triangle Roofing was awarded the contract for Mendon Elementary in the amount of $748,810 to be completed in 2014. The supplier for all three projects is Tremco Roofing.
District solicitor Gary Matta said the board's action is pending the appropriate paperwork and approved contract documents with the contractors.
The board also took action on three other items. A resolution consenting to the Act 39 (Energy Savings) Project for the Central Westmoreland Career and Technology Center with Johnson Controls Inc. was approved with the stipulation that the Yough School District's share of the cost is not to exceed $75,000 annually for a period of 15 years.
The board approved a lease agreement with Westmoreland Intermediate Unit #7 for a classroom located at West Newton Elementary beginning Sept. 1, 2013, and ending on June 30, 2014. Superintendent Janet Sardon said the use is for an Early Intervention program.
She said the WIU had been using West Newton Elementary prior to its one-year closure and had at that time moved to a Belle Vernon Area district building. With BVA undergoing a reconfiguration, the WIU decided to go back to West Newton, she said.
The last action taken by the board at last week's meeting was the approval of the Act 39 Final Project agreement with Schneider Electric in the amount of $1,235,467.
The agreement provides for guaranteed energy savings of $996,716 and encompasses four energy conservation measures (ECMs): Entryway modifications to provide enhanced security at the high school and elementary buildings ($322,595), lighting system improvements ($649,436), building envelope improvements ($35,331), and water conservation ($8,328). Also included is additional parking lot lighting ($179,777).
An ECM that was approved in the proposed agreement, power management, was removed. Its estimated cost was $25,700.
The district's business manager, Mike Wrobleski, said another difference was the addition of the ECM for the parking lot lighting. That project has a return on investment, or guaranteed energy savings at 15 years, of $191,755 or more than 100 percent.
Additionally, some modifications were made to the entryway ECM that added $55,000 and the scope of the building envelope ECM was expanded from approximately 80 exterior doors to 130 exterior doors receiving weather stripping, he said.
Wrobleski said the energy management ECM was removed because it was determined the district already had some programs in place and the return on investment would not be there.
William S. Zirkle is an editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 724-872-6800.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.