Piano from former Sutersville Elementary School may be sold
The brown Kimball upright piano that Sutersville Borough inherited when it acquired the former Sutersville Elementary School from the Yough School District, could be up for sale, but not before the borough council learns whether senior citizens meeting at the community center want to use it.
Sutersville Council President William Ringbloom said last week that David Vines had inquired about buying the piano, which sits in the hallway outside the borough council chambers in the former elementary school.
There was no discussion of any offer that Vines might make for the piano and Vines could not be reached for comment.
Sutersville Mayor Alaina Breakiron said she would ask Sutersville Senior Citizens, a group that meets in the borough building, whether it is interested in having the piano.
Just how much the Kimball piano is worth is a mystery to Sutersville council members. Solicitor Wayne McGrew said that one of the senior citizens may know its value.
A small plaque on the piano states it is the property of the Sutersville PTO and is to be used in the Sutersville Elementary School. Dates marked on the inside, possibly references to tune-ups, range from November 1976 to January 1988.
The W.W. Kimball Piano Co. of Chicago was perhaps the most famous of all piano manufacturers, according to the website for the Antique Piano Shop of Friendsville, Tenn. The Kimball model piano has what Kimball refers to as its “exclusive mezzo-thermoneal stabilizer,” which the company stated was to ensure tonal stability.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.