Smithton paving project to begin soon
Smithton's paving project, paid for through a Community Development Block Grant, is set to get underway soon.
A pre-construction meeting between the contractor and borough officials took place Sept. 4. During that meeting, the contractor, A. Folino of Oakmont, said work should begin the end of September or the beginning of October, according to council President Dan Barthels.
Barthels also noted at Monday's council meeting that the CDBG would be covering the additional $1,700 that was the difference between the grant and the contractor's bid.
The nearly $32,000 project entails paving Fort and Smithfield streets and part of First Street.
In other business, council approved adopting the new ordinance amendment regulating the disposal of grass clippings and yard waste on borough streets.
The ordinance amendment was prompted by ongoing problems with grass clippings and yard waste clogging up storm drains, resulting in flooding.
Residents are advised that leaving grass clippings and other forms of yard waste on the street is prohibited.
Council also approved the design and bid for welcome signs. Lowest bid came from Carl's Signs of Ruffsdale. Mayor Christine Tutena said she hopes that at least one of the signs is installed in time for Community Day.
Community Day is slated for Oct. 5. Any organization wishing to set up a table is asked to contact Bud Seglowich at 724-872-7928.
Barthels noted that the audit of the Municipal Authority has been completed and a copy is available for public inspection at the borough office.
William S. Zirkle is an editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at email@example.com or 724-872-6800.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- NYC public schools to close on 2 major Muslim holidays
- Weather causing minor problems in Armstrong
- Penguins forwards struggle in loss to Avalanche
- Starkey: In defense of Mel Kiper Jr.
- Agent: Polamalu undecided whether to play in 2015
- Spirit Airlines puts Chicago on its flight path
- Changes on way to table
- Driver in crash sues ambulance driver, New Kensington
- Supreme Court split on Obamacare subsidies
- Officials will train camera on Neville Island coke plant
- Wolf’s Pa. budget plan seen as having almost no chance