More water protection from Marcellus shale suggested for Pennsylvania
By The Associated Press
Published: Monday, April 16, 2012,
A former top environmental official says Pennsylvania's successful efforts to keep Marcellus Shale wastewater away from drinking water supplies should be extended to other oil and gas drillers.
"It's the same industry. It is the same contaminants. And the goal should be the same," said George Jugovic Jr., former southwest regional director of the Department of Environmental Protection and president of PennFuture, an environmental group.
An Associated Press analysis of state data found that in the second half of 2011, about 1.86 million barrels — or about 78 million gallons — of drilling wastewater from conventional oil and gas wells were still being sent to treatment plants that discharge into rivers.
The core issue is whether a problem in waterways has been solved, or whether more needs to be done.
In 2010, health experts raised alarms when they found soaring levels of ultra-salty bromides in rivers and streams that are major sources of drinking water. The general view was that wastewater from Marcellus Shale gas drilling — polluted with heavy bromides from deep underground — was contributing to the problem.
High levels of bromides can contaminate drinking water with levels that exceed national safety standards and are potentially harmful. Though not considered a pollutant by themselves, the bromides combine with the chlorine used in water treatment to produce trihalomethanes, which may cause cancer if ingested over a long period of time.
Bromide levels were so high in rivers during 2010 that they caused corrosion at some plants using the water.
But since spring 2011, most Marcellus drillers have been recycling the fluids or sending then to deep underground wells, mostly in Ohio.
The gas-rich Marcellus, which lies thousands of feet underground, has attracted a gold rush of drillers who have drilled almost 5,000 new wells in the past five years. But the state also has about 70,000 older oil and gas wells that target shallower reserves, according to DEP statistics.
Researchers say the bromide levels dropped last summer, but they had expected more of a decline after virtually all of the Marcellus shale drillers stopped disposing wastewater into plants that discharge into rivers.
Conventional oil and gas wells weren't included in last year's recycling push — a loophole that state environmental officials downplayed at the time.
Jugovic said DEP Secretary Mike Krancer should now take "the next step" and get voluntary compliance from the rest of the gas industry.
"It's hard scientifically to justify a distinction between treating conventional wastewater differently. The wastewater is being disposed in plants that are not capable of treating those contaminants," he said.
Dave Mashek, a spokesman for the Pa. Independent Oil & Gas Association, declined to comment.
DEP spokesman Kevin Sunday said the volume of conventional oil and gas waste is "substantially smaller" than the Marcellus amounts.
But the AP found that 78 million gallons of oil and gas wastewater were still being taken to treatment plants in the second half of 2011 — about 33 percent less than the Marcellus quantity that was raising concerns in 2010, but still a substantial amount. If that rate continues, the conventional wells will send about 150 million gallons of the wastewater to treatment plants that discharge into rivers this year.
Sunday said the agency encourages wastewater recycling, "regardless of the industry involved," and added that the conventional oil and gas drillers don't produce as much wastewater as Marcellus drillers.
Sunday also said the agency has a revised permit to encourage recycling of waste. Ten facilities have applied for the new permit; if all are approved, that would double the number of such facilities in the state.
Environmental Protection Agency spokesman David Sternberg didn't directly answer a question about whether there was any scientific justification for treating the non-Marcellus waste differently. Sternberg said EPA, which urged Pennsylvania regulators last year to halt the dumping, is working closely with state regulators "to ensure that, where wastewater treatment facilities are accepting oil and gas wastewaters, discharges from these treatment facilities are in compliance with the Clean Water Act."
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.