Prospect: Seneca Valley's Forrest Barnes
By Kevin Gorman
Published: Sunday, April 8, 2012,
Seneca Valley running back Forrest Barnes swears that the cheers of "Run, Forrest, Run" don't bother him at all.
"Actually, it motivates me," he said. "I go out onto the field with the confidence that I'm one of the fastest out there. Why not show them a modern-day version of what the 'Run, Forest, Run' looks like?"
Recently timed in the 100-meter dash at 10.88 seconds, Barnes is a dual threat out of the backfield. He was the sixth-leading rusher in WPIAL Class AAAA last season and also led the Raiders in receptions. It also doesn't hurt that his best games came against McKeesport (230 rushing yards, four touchdowns) and Penn Hills (11 catches for 113 yards and a TD).
"He bounces off a lot of tackles you wouldn't think a medium-sized guy would," Seneca Valley coach Don Holl said. "He's a good change-of-direction guy, a powerful kid who runs ridiculously fast. He was super productive for us. That doesn't always translate (to college), but he can catch the ball, run the ball and get to the house."
Because of his size, Barnes also is receptive to playing receiver. He is drawing interest from Pitt, Illinois, N.C. State, Syracuse and Temple, as well as Harvard and Princeton.
"I want to go as a running back," he said, "but I'll play in the slot or wing back, wherever I can get the ball in space."
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.