Dad injured as he saves son from SUV's path
By Chuck Biedka
Published: Friday, April 6, 2012
A Tarentum father was accidentally run over by his mother-in-law on Thursday but he saved his 5-year-old son from serious injury by pushing the boy out of the way of her slow-moving SUV, police said.
John Flatt, 34, of the 100 block of East 10th Avenue, Tarentum, was listed in serious condition last night at UPMC Presbyterian, Pittsburgh, where he was treated for back injuries.
The accident happened in a cinder parking lot off Mill Street across from Tarentum Borough's maintenance garage.
Police said the unlikely mishap happened soon after Flatt took a walk along Bull Creek with his son, Calib, at about 3:30 p.m.
Mother-in-law Hope Vickers, 50, of Bull Creek Road, Fawn, arrived to pick up the boy, Tarentum police Chief Bill Vakulick said.
A younger sibling was in a car seat in the large Chevrolet SUV. The child started crying as Vickers started forward, the chief said, and she turned for a moment to check on the child.
At the same instant, Calib's sandal came off as he crossed in front of the SUV and his father bent down to get it.
"He saw it coming and was able to push the boy aside," Patrolman Kurt Jendrejewski said.
Flatt, however, was run over by one of the SUV's wheels, police said.
Calib was listed in stable condition last night in Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh.
The shaken mother-in-law was driven from the scene.
"This was an accident," Vakulick said. "A bad accident."
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.